This article is about imagery in literary texts. This article has multiple issues. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. It appeals to human senses to deepen the reader’s mental imagery techniques pdf of the work.
Powerful forms of imagery engage all of the senses pro lenses. This page was last edited on 25 December 2017, at 09:25. Proponents of recovered memory therapy claim that traumatic memories can be buried in the subconscious and affect current behavior, and that these can be recovered. These researchers argue that RMT can result in patients recalling instances of sexual abuse from their childhood that did not actually occur. While practiced by some individual therapists, these techniques were never recognized by the psychiatric or psychological community, and are generally not practiced in mainstream treatment modalities. Despite the lack of such a coherent method or training—the term sometimes crops up not only in the popular press but also in government inquiries, court proceedings, and position statements from psychologists’ professional associations. 17 years later, especially when it was perpetrated by someone familiar to them.
Hopper cites several studies of corroborated abuse in which some abuse victims will have intervals of complete or partial amnesia for their abuse. A review article on potentially harmful therapies listed RMT as a treatment that will probably produce harm in some who receive it. FMSF, describes the practice of “recovering” memories as fraudulent and dangerous. This involved using a suggestive technique called “familial informant false narrative procedure,” in which the experimenter claims the validity of the false event is supported by a family member of the subject.
The study has been used to support the theory that false memories of traumatic sexual abuse can be implanted in a patient by therapists. Critics contend that Loftus’s conclusions overreach the evidence. Loftus has rebutted these criticisms. Some patients later retract memories they had previously believed to be recovered. While false or contrived memories are possible reasons for such retractions, other explanations suggested for the retraction of allegations of abuse made by children and adults include guilt, a feeling of obligation to protect their family and a reaction to familial stress rather than a genuine belief that their memories are false. The number of retractions is reported to be small compared to the actual number of child sexual abuse allegations made based on recovered memories.